Asian Surveying & Mapping
Breaking News
High-resolution spatial maps to assess climate-related shocks
Insurance companies and governments worldwide are increasingly using spatial...
Aurecon strengthens digital offering in Greater China to help clients future-proof their infrastructure
Hong Kong – As businesses across Asia continue to...
Synspective and GCRS Announce Partnership for SAR Satellite-Based Risk Analysis Solutions in South Asia
Geo Climate Risk  Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (GCRS), a solution...
Teledyne Optech Galaxy T2000 mobilized for earthquake recovery and reconstruction effort in China
Vaughan, Ontario, CANADA – Teledyne Geospatial announced that the State...
Presagis Teams with Kambill Systems to Provide Artificial Intelligence-Based Geospatial Services in Asia Pacific
First two Contracts Awarded by Indian National Survey Agency/State...
Synspective and GCRS Announce Partnership for SAR Satellite-Based Risk Analysis Solutions in South Asia
2022 November 15, Tokyo – Geo Climate Risk Solutions...
Fugro opens state-of-the-art space control centre SpAARC in Perth
Fugro has officially opened the Australian Space Automation, Artificial...
Chinese scientists create new detailed map of moon rocks
BEIJING - Chinese scientists have created a high-resolution map...
Russia and Iran expand space cooperation
Russia and Iran are gradually expanding their cooperation in...
Korea bolsters spatial data cooperation with Tanzania, Ethiopia
The government will help Tanzania and Ethiopia with effective...

In a perfectly (flat) world, GIS buffering would assume a distance from a central point and draw a circle around that point of equal distance until it closes. It would look like a pie. The results would be accurate and one could roll up the paper and take it anywhere in the world, roll it out, and show it to clapping fans.

The problem is – the world is not flat. Datums matter. The concept of drawing that same circle on the world as we know it today gives rise to conflicts in positional accuracy and precision. This happens due to the fact that the world is not just unround, but it is very elongated elliptical shaped. In fact, recently released gravity data for the world and a new model describe the world more like an apple. That’s another story – let’s get back to the datums.

What really prompted this entry is the excellent article by Drew Flater and the Esri Geoprocessing Development Team (noted below). That team showed that if one uses a GIS software to buffer over wide areas, then datums ultimately play a more important role. Suddenly that nice circular buffer bends, twists and takes on a different shape, extending to conform with the existing datum (see the article pictures).

My guess is that many of us forget these quirks as they happen at times, reminded only when we see them in maps and other cartographic products that depend upon physical properties of the earth. In the case of the recent Japan Earthquake event it has particular significance.

As the buffer or so called radiation impacted area increases in size and is displayed using a map, then the significance of the datum begins to play a greater role. Depending on the size of the buffer, it may take on different meaning. Once we start talking about a few thousand kilometers or so in terms of radiative effects, then questions relating to distances begin to change as displayed in buffered computations.

It has been reported that the Japan land base was moved up to 25 meters in places due to the earthquake. In other places the land has shifted downward, causing the recent flooding we have witnessed, as heights decreased. It is important to understand that mapping and geospatial technologies consider the physical shape of the earth when operating. Accordingly, as seismic activity and other events occur, our solutions can be impacted.


Canadian Spatial Reference System (CSRS) High Precision Datum

SLA Coordinated Cadastre

Mean Sea Level, GPS, and the Geoid

Understanding Geodesic Buffering