Asian Surveying & Mapping
Breaking News
European aerial surveying industry gathered at the 2022 EAASI Summit
More than 70 members of the aerial mapping industry...
China releases report on remote sensing monitoring for global ecology
BEIJING - China's Ministry of Science and Technology issued...
Singapore launches Environmental Services Industry Transformation Map, to create more than 1,600 PMET jobs by 2025
With a total of 23 Industry Transformation Maps to be...
China builds new dam in Tibet near Indian border
In a development that is a matter of concern...
Abu Dhabi’s Bayanat more than doubles 2022 net profit on revenue boost
Bayanat, a geospatial data products and services provider which listed...
Esri India Inks MoU with TEXMiN – IIT (ISM) Dhanbad
Esri India, the country’s leading Geographic Information System (GIS)...
China forms all-weather remote sensing monitoring system for all waters, islands: top aerospace authorities
China’s space technology was deeply applied in the country’s...
EU and Japan to improve Earth observation data through Copernicus
As part of a recent agreement, Japan will provide...
Indonesia deploys first student satellite through KiboCUBE programme
VIENNA - Indonesia has successfully deployed its first student...
Joshimath Crisis: ISRO Satellite Images, Reports Show How the Entire Town is at the Brink of Collapse
An eerie silence prevails over the small town of...
pakistan map

Firstly, i would like to mention the aims and objectives of the Bill for explaining my viewpoint on it. 

(i) to transform the Survey of Pakistan into a National Mapping Agency ie an authority regulating surveying and mapping activities in the country; 
(ii) to make it compulsory for all firms involved in Surveying and Mapping activities to get themselves registered with the Survey of Pakistan; 
(iii) to make it obligatory for all firms involved in Surveying and Mapping activities to adopt Surveying and Mapping standards framed by the National Mapping Agency, ie the Survey of Pakistan; 
(iv) to stop unqualified/unregistered firms from taking part in surveying and mapping activities that could pose a security risk to the state; 
(v) to protect established and affixed survey markers at various locations across the country from damage by assigning their responsibility to local district management/ governments; 
(vi) to avoid duplication of efforts in the field of mapping especially in the public sector, thereby economising on public exchequer; and 
(vii) to assess mapping requirements of public and private sectors on a yearly basis, thereby lending technical support to federal and provincial developmental plans and activities.

A few colleagues of mine mentioned, “Then there will be no GIS market..in actual things will be different than these fancy words…” althoug “things in words frame look fancy and easy, but who would ensure the transparency?”

Keeping in view the 7-points objectives and the mapping business environment in Pakistan which is being led by international mapping agencies like UN offices, IMMAP, USAID and some local leading firms like NESPAK, it can safely be said that this bill would not make any significant difference to the ongoing geospatial development and large digital data repository of the country. In fact, I would argue in favor of this bill as it will ensure the standard mapping practices and serve the country similar to an national SDI (spatial data infrastructure) under the direction of Survey of Pakistan.

The current non-centralised mapping efforts result in a lot of data redundancy and poor data sharing, that are beyond the scope of this topic. This bill is expected to provide a cross-organisational national platform for data sharing.  For the negative reviews that the maps and map makers could face a crackdown by the government on security-related concerns, I would suggest that the situation would be much better than the expected-hostile mapping environment after the enactment of this bill. If our engineers, surveyors, doctors, planners … all follow a national standard of education and practice …then why not a regulatory authority for GIS experts and GIS products in the country? It would encourage standardised mapping outputs and fast pace the geospatial data generation and sharing.